潜水艇侵权
法院审理后认为原告公司系案涉注册商标专用权人依法享有的注册商标专用权应受到法律保护他人不得实施侵犯其注册
商标专用权的行为商户虽辩解商标标识有区别不完全一致但判断商标是否近似应以相关公众的一般注意力为标准案中的
仿冒地漏上的商标与原告注册商标近似在普通消费者看来就是潜水艇已经对一般消费者造成了混淆故案中商户未经
商标注册人的许可销售与原告注册商标近似的商品构成了侵权最终部分商户对原告进行赔偿后达成和解未和解的商
户经依法判决赔偿原告7000元的经济损失及维权开支。
Disclaimer: The above articles are added by users themselves and are only for typing and communication purposes. They do not represent the views of this website, and this website does not assume any legal responsibility. This statement is hereby made! If there is any infringement of your rights, please contact us promptly to delete it.